Spread Betting v Fixed Odds
Filed in archive Betting by jo on May 3, 2005
is just another betting event and with the odds of the current Labour Party winning being as short as 1-20, many turn to the more financially oriented 'spread betting' to gain a profit.The Times offers a simple explanation of the difference between conventional betting and spread bettingLike playing on the stock market, with spread betting you predict an outcome to be higher or lower than a given quote - and buy or sell on that spread.
Whilst normal fixed odds betting offer you a fixed outcome against a quoted price such as 10-1 or 5-2, in spread betting the gains or losses are usually unlimited
For example, with fixed odds betting - if the odds of an event are 1-5 and you place $5 on that event. If you win, you win a $1 profit
However, spread betting is based on the supply and demand of a given quote - using research from opinion polls and trend data. A person can buy or sell against this quote and the more people that buy, the more the spread moves
A simple example is the amount of 'seats' to be won in the election.
The spread could be 360-363. If you think Labour would win more seats, you would buy this at 363. If you think they would do worse, you would sell at 360.
If you buy at $1 and Labour win 375, you have won a profit of $12. However, if you buy at $1 and they only win 350, you've made a loss of $13
The stakes are clearer higher with the uncertainty of market movements in spread betting (the market spread continuously shifts like any financial market)
Its a dangerous game to play - the gains can be huge, so can the losses. However, you can cut your losses at any time by closing your bet and many firms offer a 'stop loss' option that automatically closes your bet so you don't lose too much
Permalink: Spread Betting v Fixed Odds
Tags:
betting
gambling
Trackback: http://www.creative-weblogging.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.pl/6260

Mr Wong
